Thursday, November 5, 2015

I side with....

    Social security needs to expand to cover the costs of the quickly aging population. Bernie sanders wants to end elderly poverty rate by removing or raising the cap placed on the taxable income that goes back into social security. Social security keeps millions senior citizens out of poverty. Before social security was around, about of the senior citizen population were in poverty. With social security, fewer than 10% of all senior citizens live in poverty. This huge difference is all made by what some of us rely on.  Bernie refutes Republican views, which claim that social security “is going broke.”
   Bernie has introduced his plan in order to raise the cap on taxable income so that the upper class ($250,000 a year) will pay the amount towards social security as middle and lower class earnings. He also did not agree with the idea to raise the social security age. This would mean that the elderly would have to wait longer in order to receive their social security. Lifting the cap will allow social security payments to rise about $65 a month. “The social security expansion act will ultimately expand retirement benefits for the retirement program and would only impact the top 1.5% of wage owners.” Many people work hard their lives. At this point in a senior citizens life, they do not need to invest anymore, their job is essentially over. The elderly would be using their extra money for something of their interest, which is something difficult to achieve.

    I agree with Bernie. Lifting the cap would allow the government to invest more money in social security which would ultimately increase the “life expectancy” of social security. The increase in spending of the money from the elderly would also stimulate our economy and increase our GDP causing an increase in aggregate demand as shown in the graph. 

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Cap and Trade


There is so much pollution in today's' society. Every where you look there is some sort of pollution whether it be from the cars or your snow blower. Cap and trade is a tool to protecting the environment by controlling amounts of emissions into the environment. A carbon tax is taxing the people for the right to pollute. Many people will not stop driving their car in order to stop polluting. The people would be willing to pay more if it meant that they can still use their car.In "Carbon Tax V cap-and-trade: which is better?" it states that cap and trade sets a maximum level of pollution and distributes emission permits among the firms that produce the emission. This is showing how cap and trade works. A cap and trade takes more control than in a tax. This is because the government has a set amount of supply that the firm can use. This limits them and makes them rethink how conserve the emission. In addition to this, the article "We Need a Well-Designed Cap-and-Trade program to fight global warming" states that a Cap and trade is not enough alone. The government must do more to bring down the carbon emissions. There should be "Parallel Policies." This means that the government should also provide a full range of clean technology. If the government sets a cap on the supply, the consumers are going to find other ways to fill in those needs. In order to let that happen, there needs to be a wide range of technologies. This is why a cap-and-trade is more beneficial to have a higher motivation in finding alternatives. In a Carbon tax, the article "Carbon Tax V cap-and-trade: which is better?" states that it gives an incentive to reduce pollution.  I believe that this would not work to bring the over all carbon emission down. This is because although the taxes would be raised, people would still find it in their budget to pay more in order to keep their goods and services. People cherish the cars they drive and would do anything to drive them. Along with this the government would have to find the exact level of taxing. So putting a tax on the carbon emission is not the most effective way of reducing the emission. This would not solve the problem to reduce the amounts of emission into the environment. 

In the picture is shows the curve for Taxing and for a cap and trade. The cap and trade has the supply curve going straight up and down. This is the limit to the carbon emissions. This stimulates research and innovation to find alternatives to bring the emission rate down.

Friday, September 18, 2015

Gas



Everyone hates that time of the week. When the car runs out of gas and need to go fill up more. Everyone dreads the prices of the gas because no one every knows what its going to be. The New York times article Gas, Still Not as Cheap as It Used to Be demonstrates how supply and demand controls how much you but gas. Supply is how much of a product there is and demand is how much the consumers want the product. For example, if a determinant for supply, like technology and resources, increase then the easier it is to get oil. This causes a decrease in the price of oil. Another example is that if there is an oil spill, then there is limited supply and the prices go up. This allows the seller to increase the prices to as much the consumers would buy.

Monday, September 7, 2015

Economics in our Everyday Lives


Do you ever have to weigh your options and have to pick between two things? Well that is opportunity cost. Opportunity cost is what you give up in order to get what you want. Soccer Fest is a soccer tournament that happens every year the weekend before labor day weekend. It takes place over the course of three days in three different locations. Over three hundred teams from Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin take part in this event. They need many workers to keep everything working smoothly for example, field marshals and referees. I worked all weekend as a referee in the cold and rain. I had the option of staying home in the warmth and relaxing with my family and friends but instead I chose to work in the cold and rain and give up my time to make a good amount of money. Another example would be this weekend at September Fest. Instead of having fun with my friends at September Fest, I chose to stay home to study for math test that I need to get above an 80% in order to stay in that class. You may not know it, but subconsciously we use opportunity cost all the time.